Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Variation in Gametophytic and Sporophytic Features among Three Disjunct Populations of Funaria hygrometrica

Abstract

The paper reveals the variation of gametophytic and sporophytic in three different populations of Funaria hygrometrica collected from Shillong, Srinagar and Darjeeling. The morphology, dimensional parameters and ornamentation of spores are significant in delimitating the taxa in Funaria. ANOVA test showed significant differences in the length of stem length, leaf length&breath, basal and apical cell size, length of seta, length of capsule, exostome and endostome length, polar axis and equatorial diameter of spores. The PCA graph of composite data shows clear segregation among three samples from three locations. Canonical Correspondence Analysis revealed the correlation between climatic factors and morphometric parameters. This study establishes that dimensional aspects should not be considered always for species identification and spore ornamentation should be considered along with other morphological features for species identification.

Keywords

Funaria, Moss, Spore-Ornamentation, Taxonomy, Variation.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. BERGAMI, A. AND M. PEINTINGER 2002. Effects of light and nitrogen on morphological plasticity of the moss Calliergonella cuspidata. Oikos 96: 355-363.
  2. ERDTMAN, G. 1960. The acetolysis method. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 54: 561-564.
  3. HASSEL, K., B. PEDERSEN AND L. SÖDERSTRÖM 2005. Changes in life-history traits in an expanding moss species : phenotypic plasticity or genetic differentiation ? A reciprocal transplantation experiment with Poganatum dentatum. Ecography 28: 71 – 80.
  4. GANGULEE H.C. 1974 – 77. Mosses of Eastern India and adjacent regions, Vol. II (Fasc. 4 – 6) Books and Allied Limited, Kolkata, India.
  5. GOFFINET, B., W. R. BUCK AND J. SHAW 2009. Morphology, anatomy and classification of the Bryophyta. In: Goffinet B, Shaw J (Eds) Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge University Press, UK, 55-138.
  6. IVERSEN, J. AND J. TROELS-SMITH 1950. Pollenmorfologiske definitioner og typer. Danmarks geologiske under søgeolse 4, No. 8.
  7. KHOSHRAVESH, R. AND S. H. OSALOO 2007. Spore morphology of certain mosses of northern Iran: Taxonomical and ecological implications. Iran. J. Bot. 13 (2): 150 - 159.
  8. LUI-PONZO A. P. AND O. M. BORTH 1998. Spore morphology of some Bruchiaceae species (Bryophyta) from Brazil. Grana 37 (4): 222 – 227.
  9. LUI-PONZO, A. P. AND O. M. BARTH 1999. Spore morphology of some Dicranaceae species (Bryophyta) from Brazil. Grana 38:42-49.
  10. MCINTOSH, T. T. 2007. Funariaceae schwägrischen. Flora of North America (27): 180 – 189.
  11. PRICE, T.D., A. QVARNSTRÖM, AND D.E. IRWIN 2003. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270, 1433-1440.
  12. ROBINSON, H. 1968. Notes on Bryophytes from the Himalayas and Assam. Bryologist 71(2): 82-97.
  13. SAVAROĞLU, F., I. P. ERKARA, C. BAYCU AND M. ALKAN 2007. Spore morphology of some Bryaceae Schwigr. species (Bryophyta) from Turkey. Int. J. Nat. Eng. Sci. 1 (2): 49 – 54.
  14. SAVAROĞLU, F AND I.P. ERKARA 2008. Observation of spore morphology of some Pottiaceae Schimp. species (Bryophyta) in Turkey. Pl. Syst. Evol. 271: 93 – 99.
  15. SCHLICHTING, C.D. 1986. The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 667-693.
  16. SHAW, A.J. 1993. Morphological uniformity among widely disjunct populations of the rare “Copper moss†Scopelophila cataractae (Pottiaceae). Syst. Bot. 18(3): 525-537.
  17. SONG, S., X. LIU, X. BAI, X. ZHANG, C. YU AND X. SHAO 2015. Impacts of environmental heterogeneity on moss diversity and distribution of Didymodon (Pottiaceae) in Tibet, China. Plos one. 1-17.
  18. TER BRAAK, C. J. F. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigen vector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.

Most read articles by the same author(s)